I always assumed it didn't matter. As long as the end result was you cycled say 5K through their machines it didn't matter if it came from a shorter session doing max bets between $3 and $5 or a longer session betting between $1 and $2 per spin.

However, I was just watching one of Brian Christopher's videos and he was using a friend's player's card because he was low rolling as opposed to max betting, noting it would negatively affect his comps to low roll after only exclusively max betting.

Anyone know the answer to this? If he's right, that's BS, but it would explain why my Foxwoods comps have been going down the toilet recently despite cycling(losing) the same amount through their machines per session. The only difference is I haven't been max betting as much recently because I was sick of going through my bank roll so quickly most sessions.